These include rogue waves, undersea methane explosions, or strange geomagnetic fluctuations. They test these explanations with scale models and sophisticated simulations.īut in fact, this representation of being scientific is wrong. To investigate the Bermuda Triangle scientifically, we would start with an observation, and then test hypotheses to explain it. Popular programming today tends to skip the very first step: actually having an observation to explain. One of the first things you learn when researching the Bermuda Triangle responsibly - which means including source material beyond the TV shockumentaries and pulp paperbacks that promote the mystery wholeheartedly - is that transportation losses inside the Bermuda Triangle do not occur at a rate higher than anywhere else, and the number of losses that are unexplained is also not any higher. Statistically speaking, there is no Bermuda Triangle. The books and TV shows are trying to explain an imaginary observation. The United States Coast Guard, which is the primary safety authority in the area, has this to say: #Vile vortices history channel documentary tv #Vile vortices history channel documentary tv.#Vile vortices history channel documentary skin.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |